If we are biological creatures, and our brains can become ill, what does it actually mean to live dependent on God? And why do we so often assume that dependence on God should produce emotional and behavioral changes?
If God created us, then there’s no divider between God and any part of us. That includes our biology. We don’t have to separate God from medicine, or medicine from psychiatry, as though they belong in different worlds.
I remember Tania, a woman of deep faith who struggled with severe anxiety. She prayed regularly, studied her Bible, and believed God could heal her.
But she was having trouble getting out of her house, concentrating, getting through her workday, and connecting emotionally with the people she loved.
She wondered why God wasn’t answering her prayers.
When we discussed medication, she hesitated. Would taking an antidepressant mean she wasn’t trusting God enough? If God could heal her, shouldn’t she just have more faith?
(As an aside, Reader, note that the term, “antidepressant” refers to a class of medications that could just as well be termed, “antianxiety”. They are FDA approved for both.)
I asked Tania whether she felt the same way about wearing eyeglasses for her poor vision.
“No, of course not! They’re just eyeglasses!”
Why would we consider one organ worthy of medical treatment (the eyeball), while expecting another (the brain) to respond primarily to spiritual effort?
The brain is an organ. It is biological, just as the eyes, pancreas, heart, and kidneys are biological. And when the brain becomes ill, our emotions, thoughts, perceptions, and behaviors can change. Because that’s where emotions, thoughts, perceptions, and behaviors come from! The brain!
Healthy brain, healthy emotions, thoughts, perceptions, and behaviors. And vice versa.
Now, I’m exaggerating for clarity. Of course, people with healthy brains experience sadness, fear, anger, grief, and all kinds of rough emotions. That’s not necessarily illness. But the health of our brain affects how we think, feel, perceive, and behave. That’s biology.
If God created us, then He created us as biological beings. Our biology is not separate from Him. But we are also not automatons. We have free will. We make choices. We can seek treatment, decline treatment, pray, resist, trust, question, and struggle.
Don’t misunderstand me. I’m not saying that illness results from choosing separation from God. Having free will doesn’t mean we can simply choose our biology into behaving the way we’d like.
But free will is a thing. God fights for us to have it. We can choose to be connected to Him or not. And every choice, like the butterfly, has far-reaching effects.
Yet even when we make choices that are healthy and consistent with our faith, our symptoms may remain. The presence of illness does not necessarily reflect the absence of faith. And accepting medical treatment does not mean rejecting dependence on God.
And here’s where I think we get into trouble.
We start measuring someone’s dependence on God by their emotions and behaviors. If they’re still anxious, still depressed, still struggling, we wonder whether they’re really trusting Him. We might assume that if someone is truly depending on Him, their emotions and behaviors should reflect that dependence. But emotions and behaviors arise from the brain, and the brain can become ill.
What if their brain is ill?
I’m not saying behavior doesn’t matter in our spiritual lives. Of course it does. As does ree will and personal responsibility. Matter. A lot.
But behavior cannot always be interpreted accurately without understanding the biological condition of the person. And this is where we risk misrepresenting God’s character. We moralize emotions and behaviors, interpreting psychiatric symptoms, emotional struggles, or behavioral limitations as evidence of spiritual deficiency.
God created us as biological beings. Expect then, that our biology would be relevant to our spiritual lives.
Think about Tania. She loved God. She prayed. She wanted to trust Him. And she had anxiety.
Why should we assume that taking medication would somehow diminish her dependence on God? We wouldn’t say that about her eyeglasses. Illness isn’t contiguous with not depending on God.
Tania could pray, trust God, and seek medical treatment. There was no need to choose between them. Her anxiety was not evidence that she lacked faith, nor was her decision to consider medication a rejection of dependence on God. Tania’s disease symptoms, the speed of which she responded to treatment, her recovery, or her lack of recovery – none of that was a measure of her relationship with God.
Tania’s symptoms don’t tell us the condition of her relationship with God.
Self-care Tip: Getting treatment for psychiatric illness doesn’t mean you’re depending on God any less than wearing eyeglasses does.
Keep on!
Question: Are we judging our own faith, or someone else’s, by emotional and behavioral outcomes that may be influenced by illness?



















